Peter Gojowczyk vs Adrien Bossel Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L L W W L L
Form
L L W W L L W W W LH2H: Gojowczyk 2 - 1 Bossel
They have played 6 sets in total, with Gojowczyk winning 4 and Bossel winning 2. The last match between Gojowczyk and Bossel was at the Bergamo Challenger, 13-02-2012, Q2 round, I.hard with Adrien Bossel getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Peter Gojowczyk | 2 |
| Adrien Bossel | 1 |
Bergamo Challenger(13-02-2012)
6
3
6
4
| Gojowczyk | Stats | Bossel |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 854 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 39 | Highest Rank | 262 |
| 35 | Age | 38 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 14 | Titles | 8 |
| 55% (534-441) | Career Total W/L | 55% (381-314) |
| $1,837,855 | Career Prize Money | $18,115 |
| 2 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Medvedev VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 31 | Games Won | 28 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Peter Gojowczyk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Harold Mayot
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
48%
(
41 of
86)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
11
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kalin Ivanovski
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
9
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Akira Santillan
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Yanki Erel
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
17
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
109
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Alexander Cozbinov
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
52%
(
46 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
5
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
92
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Alexandre Aubriot
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
9
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
10
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Adrien Bossel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Louis Wessels
Player
Adrien Bossel
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
79)
13
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrien Bossel
Player
Mirko Martinez
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 2-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Nik Razborsek
Player
Adrien Bossel
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
44%
(
32 of
72)
4
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
27 of
32)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
12 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrien Bossel
Player
Anis Ghorbel
42%
(
38 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
3
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Harri Heliovaara
Player
Adrien Bossel
43%
(
23 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
73%
(
22 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florent Bax
Player
Adrien Bossel
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
43%
(
37 of
86)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
79
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (534/441) | Win/Loss | 55% (381/314) |
| 53% (1219/1062) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (878/737) |
| 51% (11117/10493) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8090/7529) |
| 59% (208/147) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (115/78) |
| 47% (114/128) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (71/74) |
| 57% (182/135) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (174/144) |
| 49% (30/31) | Grass Win/Loss | 54% (21/18) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 4258 | Aces Total | 1854 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 2229 | Total Double Faults | 1008 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 526.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 102.74 |
| 54% (24655/45516) | 1st Serve % | 55% (11572/20886) |
| 75% (18404/24655) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (8551/11572) |
| 49% (10183/20861) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4629/9314) |
| 40% (1667/4155) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (610/1610) |
| 38% (17058/45180) | Return Points Win % | 36% (7352/20605) |
| 53% (51/45) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (15/25) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (1/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 51% (110/106) | Main Tour W/L | 41% (16/23) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (212/173) | Challenger W/L | 51% (106/101) |
| 62% (145/90) | Futures W/L | 58% (259/187) |
| 56% (515/917) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (372/683) |
| 27% (11/41) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 50% (161/324) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (157/288) |
| 56% (160/288) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (108/231) |
| 85% (527/449) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (378/318) |
| 15% (527/77) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (378/60) |
| 19% (448/84) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (317/61) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
